Route the project. Ask project address and jurisdiction, existing system, replacement or construction status, floor plans, remodel and envelope history, comfort concerns, target schedule, permit need, and whether the buyer wants a standalone report or an installed-system proposal.
Define the method and practitioner. State the calculation standard and edition genuinely used, software status where relevant, who gathers field inputs, who reviews the output, and whether the firm also performs equipment selection or duct design. Do not use “Manual J” as a generic label for a square-foot rule or online estimate.
Publish the input checklist. Explain which dimensions, assemblies, glazing, shading, orientation, infiltration, ventilation, occupancy, internal gains, duct conditions, and local design data are observed, measured, obtained from plans, or assumed. Give the customer a route to correct material assumptions.
Separate J, S, and D decisions. Describe the load calculation, model-specific equipment selection, and duct-system design as connected but different steps. State whether existing ducts receive visual review, leakage or static-pressure testing, full design, or no assessment.
Scope the report and revisions. List files, rooms or zones, design conditions, assumptions, candidate equipment, duct information, permit forms, consultation time, turnaround window, revision triggers, expiration or project-change conditions, and what is excluded from the quoted fee.
Test the request path. Submit a replacement home and a remodel on mobile. Verify service-area and jurisdiction logic, upload privacy and limits, price or estimate boundary, response time, confirmation, call fallback, form-error recovery, and that the form does not promise a final tonnage before the survey.